Lobster Issue 33 (Summer 1997)
[…] intense official resistance has become. What follows, nevertheless, is a quick sketch of what all such investigators — and the public — ought to have firmly in mind. A variety of sources have been assembled here into a rough chronological narrative. But the scope of this narrative is so great that only major chapters […]
Lobster Issue 43 (Summer 2002)
[…] on MKUltra: www.cryptome.org/mkultra-0003.htm CIA IG’s memo on CB research at Fort Detrick: www.cryptome.org/mkultra-0004.htm Influencing human behaviour: www.cryptome.org/ mkultra-0001.htm Covert research facility for biological and chemical warfare: www.cryptome.org/mkultra-0005.htm Mind control forum The new site of mind control forum, Robert Naeslund and hundreds of other cases, is http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/ Peter Dale Scott Scott’s recent writing – and […]
Lobster Issue 51 (Summer 2006)
[…] detail, just states that Armen got convicted and that this fact explains why the document about early British and American interest in what is now called ‘ mind control’, which Armen found, could not be used in the main text of McCoy’s book – despite being seriously germane to his thesis. Even if McCoy’s […]
Lobster Issue 54 (Winter 2007/8)
[…] polarisation, a con via ballot-box. A con so wicked that citizens of a little town of Beslen will be expected to be grateful for ‘the vote’. Never mind that in 2004, Beslen’s children, parents and teachers paid the price of barbaric, corrupt, ‘democratic’ (!) Russian policies in Chechnya. A con so contemptuous of its […]
Lobster Issue 36 (Winter 1998/9)
[…] MI5 (after Shayler etc) and the hanky-panky in Leeds over the last few years between the BNP, AFA et al; Robin Whittaker on ‘A Method of Inducing Mind Disturbance in Targets Practicised by the British “Permanent Government”‘, an attempt to systematise what is known about this difficult subject – Whittaker has been dealing with […]
Lobster Issue 36 (Winter 1998/9)
Lost plot After Lobster 35 I received a long letter from John Pilger, followed by a revised version of it, complaining about my review of his recent book, Hidden Agendas in 35. With the second version came a note asking me to publish his letter without comment. I replied that I was happy to publish […]