[PDF file]: […] Hamilton 68 merely a passing reference.25 And the fact that Hamilton 68 got it wrong says nothing about Russian influence operations in the US. . AI on JFK again So, why not? I tried out the new AI search app ChatGPT. I asked it ‘Who was Chauncey Holt?’ And in about 5 seconds it […]
[PDF file]: […] on his show the actor George Lazenby (who played James Bond in just one film, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service). Lazenby offered his theory of who assassinated JFK. I was reminded of all this when scrolling through a discussion of Lazenby and the assassination on John Simkin’s Education Forum site.10 Said discussion is interesting […]
[PDF file]: […] about Kennedy’s assassination, he replied ‘A mansion has many rooms. I’m not privy to who struck John.’ 9 Yes, both comments could be interpreted as references to JFK but ‘who struck John’ or ‘who shot John’ are phrases going back a long way, in some reports back to the 19th century. For example, there […]
[…] to that Dallas again One of the features of the Kennedy assassination research is the absence of the opinions on whodunnit from those who were close to JFK. Until recently the only one I had come across is a third-hand account, via the then boyfriend of Jackie Kennedy’s press secretary, that Jackie had told […]
[…] to that Dallas again One of the features of the Kennedy assassination research is the absence of the opinions on whodunnit from those who were close to JFK. Until recently the only one I had come across is a third-hand account, via the then boyfriend of Jackie Kennedy’s press secretary, that Jackie had told […]
[PDF file]: […] community. My guess would be that Hunt was blanked because he named LBJ as being part of the conspiracy and LBJ-dunnit remains unthinkable for most of the JFK researchers.19 In the case of Holt, in so far as they are aware of Holt at all, JFK researchers believe that Holt’s claims were refuted by […]
[…] that *new* Dallas again One of the features of the Kennedy assassination research is the absence of the opinions on whodunnit from those who were close to JFK. Until recently the only one I had come across is a third-hand account, via the then boyfriend of Jackie Kennedy’s press secretary, that Jackie had told […]
[PDF file]: […] to that Dallas again One of the features of the Kennedy assassination research is the absence of the opinions on whodunnit from those who were close to JFK. Until recently the only one I had come across is a third-hand account, via the then boyfriend of Jackie Kennedy’s press secretary, that Jackie had told […]
[…] community. My guess would be that Hunt was blanked because he named LBJ as being part of the conspiracy and LBJ-dunnit remains unthinkable for most of the JFK researchers.19 In the case of Holt, in so far as they are aware of Holt at all, JFK researchers believe that Holt’s claims were refuted by […]
[PDF file]: The view from the bridge Robin Ramsay Kincora, Blunt and…… JFK? Because it is difficult to distinguish the shit from the shinola among the allegations and rumours, thus far I have avoided trying to make sense of the Kincora scandal’s place in the Elm House-Savile-paedos-in-high-places thicket. However one story caught my eye. In the […]
[PDF file]: Dallas again Robin Ramsay The vast majority of serious JFK researchers think that the CIA was involved in the Kennedy assassination. An apparent difficulty with this is that the plot was leaky. Those with advance knowledge included Rose Cheramie (who heard about it from two minor criminals with whom she was doing a heroin […]
